Latest Tutorials

Learn about the latest technologies from fellow newline community members!

  • React
  • Angular
  • Vue
  • Svelte
  • NextJS
  • Redux
  • Apollo
  • Storybook
  • D3
  • Testing Library
  • JavaScript
  • TypeScript
  • Node.js
  • Deno
  • Rust
  • Python
  • GraphQL
  • React
  • Angular
  • Vue
  • Svelte
  • NextJS
  • Redux
  • Apollo
  • Storybook
  • D3
  • Testing Library
  • JavaScript
  • TypeScript
  • Node.js
  • Deno
  • Rust
  • Python
  • GraphQL
    NEW

    How to Fine-Tune LLMs with Prefix Tuning

    Prefix tuning is a parameter-efficient method for adapting large language models (LLMs) to specific tasks without modifying their pre-trained weights. Instead of updating the entire model during fine-tuning, prefix tuning introduces learnable prefix parameters —continuous vectors that act as task-specific prompts. These prefixes are prepended to the input sequence and passed through all layers of the model, guiding the LLM’s behavior during inference. This approach keeps the original model parameters frozen, reducing computational costs while enabling task adaptation. The core idea stems from optimizing these prefixes to encode task-relevant information, such as instructions or contextual cues. For example, in natural language generation tasks, the prefixes might encode signals like “summarize” or “translate to French,” allowing the model to generate outputs aligned with the desired objective. Unlike traditional fine-tuning, which updates all model weights, prefix tuning isolates changes to these small, task-specific parameters, making it computationally efficient and scalable for large models. As mentioned in the section, this method falls under broader categories like prompt-based tuning, which focuses on soft instruction signals. Prefix tuning offers several advantages over conventional fine-tuning methods. First, it significantly reduces the number of parameters that need training. Studies show that prefix parameters typically account for less than 0.1% of an LLM’s total parameters, drastically cutting memory and computational requirements. This efficiency is critical for deploying large models on resource-constrained systems or when training data is limited.
    Thumbnail Image of Tutorial How to Fine-Tune LLMs with Prefix Tuning
    NEW

    Prefix Tuning GPT‑4o vs RAG‑Token: Fine-Tuning LLMs Comparison

    Prefix Tuning GPT-4o and RAG-Token represent two distinct methodologies for fine-tuning large language models, each with its unique approach and benefits. Prefix Tuning GPT-4o employs reinforcement learning directly on the base model, skipping the traditional step of supervised fine-tuning. This direct application of reinforcement learning sets it apart from conventional fine-tuning methods, which typically require initial supervised training to configure the model . This streamlined process not only speeds up adaptation but also makes training more resource-efficient. Prefix Tuning GPT-4o can potentially reduce training parameter counts by up to 99% compared to full fine-tuning processes, offering a significant reduction in computational expense . Conversely, RAG-Token takes a hybrid approach by merging generative capabilities with retrieval strategies. This combination allows for more relevant and accurate responses by accessing external information sources. The capability to pull recent and contextual data enhances the model's responsiveness to changing information and mitigates limits on context awareness seen in traditional language models . Additionally, while Prefix Tuning GPT-4o focuses on adapting pre-trained models with minimal new parameters, RAG-Token's integration of retrieval processes offers a different layer of adaptability, particularly where the model's internal context is insufficient . These differences underscore varied tuning strategies that suit different goals in refining language models. While Prefix Tuning GPT-4o emphasizes parameter efficiency and simplicity, RAG-Token prioritizes the accuracy and relevance of responses through external data access . Depending on the specific requirements, such as resource constraints or the need for updated information, each approach provides distinct advantages in optimizing large language models.

    I got a job offer, thanks in a big part to your teaching. They sent a test as part of the interview process, and this was a huge help to implement my own Node server.

    This has been a really good investment!

    Advance your career with newline Pro.

    Only $40 per month for unlimited access to over 60+ books, guides and courses!

    Learn More
    NEW

    Top LoRA Fine-Tuning LLMs Techniques Roundup

    LoRA Fine-Tuning is a key technique for optimizing large language models. By incorporating low-rank adapters into neural network layers, this method minimizes the need to modify all model parameters, conserving both time and resources . Traditional fine-tuning can be resource-intensive because it usually involves adjusting many weights across the entire network. LoRA, on the other hand, keeps the primary model weights intact and fine-tunes only the adapters. This method ensures that the core architecture is preserved, reducing risks of overfitting when adapting models to new tasks . One notable issue in the fine-tuning process, particularly for roleplay models, is the frequent use of large but mediocre data sets. These can result in less effective models because of poor dataset quality and insufficient curation . High-quality data is crucial for achieving optimal outcomes. Without it, even the best techniques fall short. LoRA's design is particularly effective because it manages to significantly lower computational demands. It achieves this by representing weight updates as low-rank matrices . This matrix decomposition allows for efficient modifications, facilitating rapid and resource-light customization of large language models to suit specific tasks or contexts .

    GPT-3 vs Traditional NLP: A Newline Perspective on Prompt Engineering

    GPT-3 uses a large-scale transformer model. This model predicts the next word when given a prompt. Traditional NLP usually relies on rule-based systems or statistical models. These require manual feature engineering. GPT-3 is thus more adaptable. It needs fewer task-specific adjustments . GPT-3 processes over 175 billion parameters. This makes it far more complex than traditional NLP models . Traditional NLP models operate on a smaller scale. This difference affects both efficiency and output capability. GPT-3 understands and generates text across various contexts. It achieves this through extensive training on massive datasets. Traditional NLP approaches need explicit rule-based instructions. They also often require specific dataset training for each task . This limits their flexibility compared to GPT-3.

    Advance Your AI Productivity: Newline's Checklist for Effective Development with Popular Libraries

    Setting up a robust AI development environment requires careful attention to tools and libraries. Begin by installing the PyTorch library. PyTorch is the backbone of more than 80% of projects involving advanced machine learning models. Its popularity ensures a wealth of resources and community support . Next, integrate containerization tools into your workflow. Docker is essential for maintaining consistency across various development setups. Using Docker reduces configuration issues and aids in seamless collaboration among developers . Ensuring these tools are part of your setup will enhance the efficiency of your AI development projects. Demonstrates setting up a basic PyTorch environment for training models. Shows how to create a Dockerfile to ensure a consistent Python environment for AI development.